I think everyone should be getting at least familiar with chatGPT/AI, because it's here to stay.
However,
"Ms. Stapleton decided to do some digging. She reviewed her professor’s slide presentations and discovered other telltale signs of A.I.: distorted text, photos of office workers with extraneous body parts and egregious misspellings."
This is just lazy. It sounds like the professor put no effort into the lesson and just pasted the output directly to slides. I would complain too.
The risk is students not knowing how invested the professor is with the AI output. Is it a “rough draft” with careful refinement, or outright dump and run? No way to know for sure.
With students submitting ChatGPT-generated essays, the professors are merely responding in kind: if you don't care to learn anything save for passing the exam, why should I waste my time crafting lectures when I can generate them?
I think everyone should be getting at least familiar with chatGPT/AI, because it's here to stay.
However,
"Ms. Stapleton decided to do some digging. She reviewed her professor’s slide presentations and discovered other telltale signs of A.I.: distorted text, photos of office workers with extraneous body parts and egregious misspellings."
This is just lazy. It sounds like the professor put no effort into the lesson and just pasted the output directly to slides. I would complain too.
The risk is students not knowing how invested the professor is with the AI output. Is it a “rough draft” with careful refinement, or outright dump and run? No way to know for sure.
With students submitting ChatGPT-generated essays, the professors are merely responding in kind: if you don't care to learn anything save for passing the exam, why should I waste my time crafting lectures when I can generate them?
https://archive.is/k0oQ9