10 comments

  • aosaigh 2 days ago ago

    I'm probably not your ideal customer, so take this with a pinch of salt, but I think you're shooting yourself in the foot by segmenting your pricing by "number of landing pages".

    I would instead price by features. For example you could segment pricing by the number of blocks you can track on a page. Free users only get 3 blocks, paid users get 50 blocks, enterprise users get unlimited blocks.

    You want to be able to convert users that are only going to need the tool on a small number of landing pages. I may be wrong, but I can't imagine anyone needing detailed analytics on 100+ landing pages

    • coursecrumbs 2 days ago ago

      I just decided to go with a simple solution for now but it doesn't mean I won't change it in the future. My plan is MVP -> feedback -> iterate. Now I am fixing last issue, prepare marketing plan to get ~50 first customers and only after I will take the next step.

    • moomoo11 a day ago ago

      I saw that he’s targeting agencies it seems. In that case it could make sense.

      At the same time I’d probably do blocks as well and up to X sites. Or unlimited at whatever the enterprise equivalent would be.

  • timpera 2 days ago ago

    Pretty cool! Just a heads up: the video is not loading in my browser (Microsoft Edge with uBlock Origin on default settings, IP address in the EU), it's stuck on "Loading video...".

    • coursecrumbs 2 days ago ago

      I just added a video 10 min ago :-) Probably need to make a fallback to image if browser doesn't support it for any reason. Thank you for a feedback!

      • timpera 2 days ago ago

        It's loading now! Thanks

        • coursecrumbs 2 days ago ago

          Yep, just fixed it. Thanks for noticing the issue.

  • codingdave 2 days ago ago

    You should dig deeper into your market research. Analytics platforms do exist that provide this level of detail. That doesn't mean you shouldn't build another one - the fact they already exist means the problem is validated. But it does make you look like someone just dipping their toes into a new idea, not an expert in this problem space. There is nothing wrong with that - everyone is new to their work/market at the beginning. But you don't want to be raising a big flag announcing it. You need to be differentiating yourself from what exists, not acting as if you are new. And say that you measure A/B tests, don't describe them as if you had never heard the term.

    But to answer the question of what we think about the product itself... I kinda despise client-side analytics that make calls out to 3rd parties (even if it is just a tracking pixel). I understand the value to marketers and PMs. But if you want something new in this problem space, send data to the app server and build server-side processing. Not only is that a cleaner client-side experience, it won't end up getting blocked by anti-spyware extensions.

    Also, you are shooting yourself in the foot by measuring landing pages. They are already a fairly weak form of marketing - they are early idea validation, not even a real product. Optimizing at this point is borderline bike-shedding. You need these types of analytics when you have a product ready to roll and are optimizing conversions. Landing pages simply are not high value enough to invest this much effort.

    • coursecrumbs 2 days ago ago

      Thanks for the feedback and ideas. Yes, the current version is maybe not unique. I am trying to build the platform that will analyze metrics but also tell how to improve a landing page or a product page using AI. This one is a super small MVP I want to validate.

      > send data to the app server and build server-side processing. Not only is that a cleaner client-side experience, it won't end up getting blocked by anti-spyware extensions

      This is also a good suggestion. I will explore this option as well.

    • chistev 2 days ago ago

      >. That doesn't mean you shouldn't build another one - the fact they already exist means the problem is validated

      Interesting POV.