19 points | by birdculture a day ago ago
5 comments
Being within the same order of magnitude is pretty impressive IMO, especially before 6 years' worth of performance improvements.
(2019) https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.09056
2022, two comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33054931
2019, 172 comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19023413
Given that this paper is from so long ago, running new benchmarks on existing runtimes would be productive.
https://mastodon.world/@cfallin/109833747279454645 mentions https://github.com/bytecodealliance/sightglass
https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc19/presentation/jangda
https://www.usenix.org/sites/default/files/conference/protec...
A lot has changed since this was published, you can’t trust these numbers at all.
True, that's from 2019. While benchmarks are rare, some actually claim near native speed
To be fair these (and similar) claims were already made when WASM was new.
Being within the same order of magnitude is pretty impressive IMO, especially before 6 years' worth of performance improvements.
(2019) https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.09056
2022, two comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33054931
2019, 172 comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19023413
Given that this paper is from so long ago, running new benchmarks on existing runtimes would be productive.
https://mastodon.world/@cfallin/109833747279454645 mentions https://github.com/bytecodealliance/sightglass
https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc19/presentation/jangda
https://www.usenix.org/sites/default/files/conference/protec...
A lot has changed since this was published, you can’t trust these numbers at all.
True, that's from 2019. While benchmarks are rare, some actually claim near native speed
To be fair these (and similar) claims were already made when WASM was new.