4 comments

  • verdverm 9 hours ago ago

    This is interesting because people out in the world are going to use LLMs to evaluate our projects. We should be mindful of this new reality. I've seen llm.txt on various projects, where they give you some markdown for their project for your agent, vs agents.md for the developers of the project.

    I guess I would never ask the LLM what it "feels" about a product or project. That token likely triggers the wrong pathways for a more analytical analysis. I see this evolving into an agent skill, where users have instructed their agent on how to find and evaluate a spectrum of projects.

    I personally want a more thorough analysis, not a short opinion

    • reconnecting 9 hours ago ago

      AI Testimonials are interesting because I believe they might evolve over time.

      LLM.txt and AGENTS.md are another story. I just checked and no one has requested those files on my domain for at least the last 3 months, so I'm not convinced this approach is working.

      • verdverm 9 hours ago ago

        Ai testimonials are a huge red flag, don't do that

        It screams inauthenticity

        • reconnecting 9 hours ago ago

          I don't mean to pass off AI-generated testimonials as real user testimonials, but taking into account that more and more engineers are using software through AI, it's possible that at some point we'll be dealing with testimonials from AI, as they become (unfortently) the main users.

          So I wouldn't be surprised if in a couple of years a software company markets something like 'Integrates with ChatGPT in 10 prompts' as a selling point.