Is AI the Next Climate Change?

(wsj.com)

6 points | by apparent 9 hours ago ago

6 comments

  • N_Lens 8 hours ago ago

    I see WSJ has minimal factual credibility at this point, but still interesting to see them throwing random articles at the wall to see what sticks.

  • wolvoleo 8 hours ago ago
  • wolvoleo 8 hours ago ago

    TL;DR - Climate change denier thinks AI concerns are a power grab

    I don't understand how a serious paper can push something like this, does anyone sane still deny climate change? Sure it's taking a while for the worst to come to pass but that's because it's a slow process.

    At least they labelled it as opinion.

    I was expecting this to be about the climate impact of AI data centres but instead it was just baseless conspiracy theories.

    • defrost 7 hours ago ago

      > does anyone sane still deny climate change?

      Absolutely, however all the significant examples I know of are making a rationalisation to publicly deny AGW for material gain while often privately accepting the physics, down playing the publicly global consequences and focusing on the probable lack of meaningful personal consequences.

      • conception an hour ago ago

        On this point - folks may forget that certain nation states with scrupulous ties to other major world powers cough Russia cough plan to benefit tremendously from climate change by opening northern trade routes. It’d be troubling if such a country had an impressively widespread propaganda and asset network across the globe.