Wikipedia has deprecated and will blacklist archive.today

(en.wikipedia.org)

8 points | by gyrovague-com 7 hours ago ago

8 comments

  • LegionMammal978 6 hours ago ago

    > Change the original source to something that doesn't need an archive (e.g., a source that was printed on paper), or for which a link to an archive is only a matter of convenience.

    As if paper sources are any less susceptible to becoming increasingly unavailable over time...

  • armchairhacker 6 hours ago ago

    The archive.today owner made a good suggestion: Wikipedia should make their own archive. They can migrate all archive.xx snapshots there. They have the resources and it would be as resilient as Wikipedia itself.

    • undefined 5 hours ago ago
      [deleted]
    • jsheard 6 hours ago ago

      Since Wikipedia established that the archiver tampered with stored pages I doubt migrating is on the cards, the trust in those archives has been burned regardless of who hosts them going forward.

      • armchairhacker 5 hours ago ago

        AFAIK the only evidence of tampered pages are those involved in this controversy. That archive.xx could tamper pages has always been possible (and a reason why Wikipedia should have their own archive, and migrate ASAP).

        But still, Wikipedia can corroborate any archive.xx page, and if they find a matching source, archive that instead.

  • undefined 6 hours ago ago
    [deleted]
  • Iolaum 6 hours ago ago

    Is there more context available - sounds like there's a bigger story than what is mentioned in the article.