Whats Up with Claude Lately?

17 points | by mech422 20 hours ago ago

14 comments

  • deminature 18 hours ago ago

    They've just gotten some substantial amount of traffic of defectors from ChatGPT, so their system may be creaking under the load. They have previously said they don't degrade their models under excessive load, but the models sure behave like they do.

    • mech422 18 hours ago ago

      Hmm - that might be ?? This has been going on for a week or two, but it definately seems worse tonight...

  • 2001zhaozhao 18 hours ago ago

    /r/ClaudeAI is full of reports that it's down

    For me claude.ai is down and i can't check my usage but claude code itself works fine

    • pants2 17 hours ago ago

      No need for Reddit, their status page has it just fine: https://status.claude.com/

      • muzani 17 hours ago ago

        It says 3 Mar 2026. No downtime recorded on this day. Related: Elevated errors in claude.ai, cowork, platform, claude code

        It's definitely not "elevated errors". It's down. Inaccessible. Not green. Yellow at best.

        What's extra annoying is it works on some accounts and not on others. It works on Cursor running Claude and Antigravity running Claude, but not on the Claude account I paid for personally.

        • reverius42 17 hours ago ago

          I think it's only down for some people, and/or some times, and therefore is just having "elevated errors" by their definition. I think "down" really means down for everyone.

          • muzani 13 hours ago ago

            Fair. It's just that the 98.92% uptime feels misleading.

    • mech422 18 hours ago ago

      hmm - I don't use the web UI... but as you say claude code seems to be working.

  • ibash 19 hours ago ago

    Aha! Same for me. A telling sign to me is it will take him 2-3 turns of “that’s not right” before he’ll say “let me do this properly…” and do what I original requested.

    • mech422 18 hours ago ago

      oh yeah - I get that too. Also, if I tell him to verify something - he'll do a big song and dance about verifying it as correct. Then you point out something very basic and he'll trigger that 'let me do this properly', verify it again, find out he was wrong - then say he was working from stale data/assumptions

    • scuff3d 18 hours ago ago

      Instead of fighting with an AI you could just... do it yourself

      • mech422 18 hours ago ago

        I've been doing it myself for 40 years...I wanna play with the new shiny abit :-D Whats the point of being a geek if you don't play with the new shinies ?

    • mech422 18 hours ago ago

      Maybe I should just hang it up and go to bed:

        That's a Claude Code issue — queued slash commands not executing between steps.
      
       you didn't answer me - is that last rule we added to MEMORY.md active and working ?
      
      ● Your point: you're asking whether rule 4 ("restate before responding") is actually being followed, because I just failed to do it two messages ago.

        No, it's not working reliably. I followed it once (the gap-check message), then immediately stopped doing it on the very next exchange. The rule exists in memory but I'm not consistently applying it.
  • mech422 20 hours ago ago

    Oh - another 'fun' new behavior this week: He contradicted himself within 1 paragraph and when asked about it, admitted the correct answer was explicitly listed in his MEMORY.md file - he just ignored it...