4 comments

  • treetalker 9 hours ago ago

    For those who may have missed prior threads on this, the denial of a petition for certiorari has no precedential effect (other than finalizing the lower court's decision in that particular case, in most instances).

    The denial does not mean that SCOTUS "doesn't care": the area of the law is relatively new; SCOTUS almost certainly wants to let the various circuits experiment with different approaches; and SCOTUS may take a case once the law matures and a good circuit split has developed.

    It could also be that this was not the right case ("bad facts make bad law").

    Nothing to see here.

  • ggm 10 hours ago ago

    I'm more taken by the strength of "you can't patent AI ideas" than the IPR of artwork. I get that there are far more creatives than patenters, so I am making a somewhat unfortunate choice here, but to me thats much more significant.

    The inverse proposition however may hold: AI derived proofs may PREVENT a patent because they didn't declare AI can't make prior art. I'd love to know if that does apply.

  • WalterGR 7 hours ago ago
  • not_the_fda 9 hours ago ago

    So is AI generated code not copy-rightable?