6 comments

  • kashunstva 15 hours ago ago

    If I’m reading the article correctly, imagery over Iran is available to clients; but that of U.S. assets is not. Seemingly this is explained by:

    > Planet also holds lucrative contracts selling overhead imagery to the US military and US government intelligence agencies.

    Nice company you got there. ‘Be a shame if you lost those U.S. government contracts.

  • wutwutwat 12 hours ago ago

    This is a private company so I'd imagine we can't label this as censorship, but are there any public funded image sats floating around us that expose unrestricted access to its entire flight path?

    • Rebelgecko 9 hours ago ago

      GOES does, although certainly not the same level of detail. I don't see anyone saying Landsat does censorship, but I haven't tried looking at spicy locations myself

    • ciaranmca 11 hours ago ago

      I would say Sent2 but there is examples of recent censorship with that as well (https://hntrbrk.com/eu-satellites/)

  • shablulman 15 hours ago ago

    [dead]

  • onetokeoverthe 15 hours ago ago

    [dead]