> five networks: Meta, Akamai, Google, Netflix, Amazon (I don’t know there is a decent name for these but i’ve been calling them the The “Magna” networks)
At a time when Meta was Facebook, there were FANG (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google) and FAANG (with Apple), but it seems to be more used in a finance context.
For inbound traffic, they're completely fine. This is only looking at the route servers. You can almost certainly receive 50/50 traffic ratios if you do bilateral peering. This post only covers the " automatic peering " services that IXs offer
> five networks: Meta, Akamai, Google, Netflix, Amazon (I don’t know there is a decent name for these but i’ve been calling them the The “Magna” networks)
At a time when Meta was Facebook, there were FANG (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google) and FAANG (with Apple), but it seems to be more used in a finance context.
Calling these Magna not Manga is a miss.
great post! key points for me:
1. 100 IXes alone would get 56% IPv4 and 61% IPv6 prefixes, but ~14% reachability
2. little uniqueness between exchanges: not many new prefixes after the top 5
3. for outbound-heavy networks IXes are great, but to attract traffic they are not (edit: applies to automatic peering via route servers)
Post author here
For inbound traffic, they're completely fine. This is only looking at the route servers. You can almost certainly receive 50/50 traffic ratios if you do bilateral peering. This post only covers the " automatic peering " services that IXs offer