802.11w [0] should protect against this, right? That's mandatory for WPA3, and I've enabled it on my routers for WPA2 also. I believe that 802.11w only works if both the client and the access point both support it, but most modern devices do.
Sarcastically: Nothing says ethical like including a full unredacted router MAC address for an unwitting third party in a repo’s screenshots. I suppose one silver lining is that the author provided enough evidence to pinpoint their location to +/-50m.
Much better to heavily spread those libraries so we actually build secure systems instead of "praying" that some people just don't act maliciously. Knowledge shouldn't be closed as well.
802.11w [0] should protect against this, right? That's mandatory for WPA3, and I've enabled it on my routers for WPA2 also. I believe that 802.11w only works if both the client and the access point both support it, but most modern devices do.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11w-2009
Ah yes, "ethical use only". That'll stop those ratbag kids.
How many forms of the shitty Wi-Fi deauther are we going to get repackaged in a different form over and over?
Sarcastically: Nothing says ethical like including a full unredacted router MAC address for an unwitting third party in a repo’s screenshots. I suppose one silver lining is that the author provided enough evidence to pinpoint their location to +/-50m.
Much better to heavily spread those libraries so we actually build secure systems instead of "praying" that some people just don't act maliciously. Knowledge shouldn't be closed as well.