7 comments

  • late_night_fix 6 hours ago ago

    Performance,startup time and memory usage matter more in terminal apps than almost anywhere else.That's why people react strongly to this.

    • orf 4 hours ago ago

      Why does the on-disk size matter for any of that?

      • skydhash 3 hours ago ago

        More code to load from disk to memory, and while it may be fast, it’s not instantaneous.

        • orf 2 hours ago ago

          SSDs can read at gigabytes per second, and only the used portions are paged into memory.

          Anything else?

          • skydhash 23 minutes ago ago

            Loading a program in memory is much more complicated than disk raw disk transfer speed.

  • flohofwoe 5 hours ago ago

    ...and you could probably shave off 20 MB from Ghostty because it is distributed as universal binary (does that even make sense in 2026)?

        > ls -al ghostty
        total 81992
        -rwxr-xr-x  1 floh  staff  41979664 Mar 13 17:08 ghostty
        > file ghostty
        ghostty: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures: [x86_64:Mach-O 64-bit executable     x86_64] [arm64]
        ghostty (for architecture x86_64):      Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64
        ghostty (for architecture arm64):       Mach-O 64-bit executable arm64
    
    E.g. the complete app bundle is 62 MB, of that the executable is 40 MB, but that contains both ARM and x86 code.
    • wpm 2 hours ago ago

      Intel Macs are still going to be usable, viable computers for at least another 5 years. It will be a decade before they pass into the night of vintage computing enthusiasts like PowerPC Macs did.