Show HN: Claude Code vs. Codex Global Usage Leaderboard

(costhawk.ai)

11 points | by optimizethis 9 hours ago ago

15 comments

  • hamid_wakili 8 hours ago ago

    i really would love to know where the data is coming from

  • maxshadurskiy 8 hours ago ago

    Good to hear. We doing something similar at https://thrumlabs.com/ but with rewards and private leaderboards

  • spiderfarmer 8 hours ago ago

    Great example of how AI can make something look decent, but when you're actually trying to grasp what it tries to communicate, you can really notice the lack of a human touch.

    • bot403 8 hours ago ago

      Not just a problem communicating but a lack of a problem here.

      Why do I want to publish my team's ai usage with this random site? It's all risk and no upside.

      • Esophagus4 5 hours ago ago

        Especially when, if you’re an org that is heavy users of AI… you could just vibe code your own leaderboard and not have to pay monthly?

        Presumably you will not be using this product long term, so why bother paying for something rather than just vibing a quick telemetry script and dashboard?

      • codybontecou 8 hours ago ago

        Pay to publish your team's ai usage*

      • cdilling-ch 7 hours ago ago

        [flagged]

    • keeganpoppen 8 hours ago ago

      the human touch from human curation of the ai output, which tends to be sorely lacking.

  • SlavikCA 8 hours ago ago

    where that usage data coming from?

    • bethekidyouwant 8 hours ago ago

      You sign up with them and they track your usage. Why would anyone want to do this?

      It’s slop all the way down.

      • Esophagus4 5 hours ago ago

        It’s not really for individuals… check the use cases tab.

        It’s for enterprise to see who’s using AI and track token usage / spend.

      • lostmsu 6 hours ago ago

        If their tracking tool is open, why not?

      • dyauspitr 8 hours ago ago

        So it’s heavily self selecting and pointless.