1. Shouldn't the judge have ruled this at the start?
Why did countless people have to testify about other stuff when a technicality was enough to render it all moot?
2. The Wapo headline is totally misleading:
"All of Musk’s claims in lawsuit against OpenAI rejected in federal trial"
That's a shame. Anyways ...
1. Shouldn't the judge have ruled this at the start? Why did countless people have to testify about other stuff when a technicality was enough to render it all moot?
2. The Wapo headline is totally misleading:
"All of Musk’s claims in lawsuit against OpenAI rejected in federal trial"
https://archive.ph/LdcXN#selection-287.0-287.72
Here's musk screaming on twitter how unfair this all is, and that he'll appeal: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2056474896641782077