6 comments

  • marssaxman 14 hours ago ago

    From the article, they will vote on a referendum about whether to vote on a referendum about whether to remain a part of Canada.

  • kennywinker 12 hours ago ago

    Funded by US oil interests

  • inhumantsar 14 hours ago ago

    Spolier: Nothing.

  • drgo 12 hours ago ago

    This was a bone that Smith threw to the extreme right (by Canadian standards) wing of her base. Even Quebec, with its stronger claim to nationhood, found it hard to disentangle itself from Canada, so it is unlikely that Alberta will succeed. But, it will still pay a price like Quebec did; businesses and people do not like secession politics, and the infighting is likely to be bruising. Smith's conservative party, as well as the federal conservatives (also led by a unpopular Albertan, may also pay a price (arguably they have already did with defections of their MPs to the Liberal party). So, all in all, this looks like another unforced error by the Canadian right.

    • skissane 12 hours ago ago

      Smith doesn't actually want to secede – she wants to use the threat of secession to extract concessions from Ottawa.

      Is that an "unforced error"? Well, it has worked for Quebec.

    • dismalaf 11 hours ago ago

      It won't have the same effect as in Quebec, because staying in Canada is a bigger business risk than Alberta seceding, since the biggest business in Alberta is oil and an independent Alberta will be significantly better for foreign oil companies.

      Whereas Quebec is the gateway for French businesses to access the Canadian market and workforce, not a place anyone specifically cares about.

      > unforced error by the Canadian right

      It has nothing to do with the Canadian right. The Canadian right has failed, the rest of Canada doesn't want them.