People often repeat this but it's not as true as you might think, as the critics are also often selectively choosing predictions and don't have knowledge of the size of bets or views of his portfolio overall. Burry has shared his own list of his past correct predictions from time to time, but he also deletes older tweets so I can't find it. But remember, the best VCs are mostly wrong and rarely right. It doesn't make them stupid.
The track record doesn't matter here. You can look at the actual scheme described here and figure out for yourself if you are concerned about it or not:
Clear map of the complicated shell company deal game being played here:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJnHmkpWkAMfj5n.jpg?name=orig
> buys
The individual or the auto-allocated retirement scheme?
>Clear
I don't think that word means what you think that word means.
He's very often wrong.
https://www.newtraderu.com/2025/11/15/michael-burrys-12-fail...
https://www.bearsavings.com/blog/michael-burry-predictions-t...
Can't help but think, being wrong on the internet might get just as many clicks...
or maybe more...
People often repeat this but it's not as true as you might think, as the critics are also often selectively choosing predictions and don't have knowledge of the size of bets or views of his portfolio overall. Burry has shared his own list of his past correct predictions from time to time, but he also deletes older tweets so I can't find it. But remember, the best VCs are mostly wrong and rarely right. It doesn't make them stupid.
The track record doesn't matter here. You can look at the actual scheme described here and figure out for yourself if you are concerned about it or not:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJnHmkpWkAMfj5n.jpg?name=orig
[dead]