ESP32-S31

(espressif.com)

98 points | by volemo an hour ago ago

38 comments

  • oritron 21 minutes ago ago

    The specs look great, will see how long it takes to get these as WROOM modules or on little dev boards; my two form factors of choice for Espressif devices. I'm also curious about the pricing, so far they've impressed me with how much more you get in successive generations at a similar price.

    If you're excited about the (relatively) speedy RISC-V cores and SIMD, look at the P4 which is available now. It has a slightly faster clock but no wireless: https://products.espressif.com/#/product-comparison?names=ES...

    There's some cool work out there using the dsp functionality and built in image handling to crunch a lot of pixel data, which should work similarly on the S31: https://www.reddit.com/r/WLED/comments/1ry2jd7/wledmmp4_with...

  • randomint64 an hour ago ago

    Espressif is on fire! And the CPU even has SIMD instructions!

    RISC-V cores is a big deal for embedded systems because now compiling for SoCs is only a matter of `rustup target add riscv32imac-unknown-none-elf` instead of downloading half-broken proprietary toolchains and SDKs.

    Take a look at https://kerkour.com/introduction-to-embedded-development-wit... and https://kerkour.com/rust-esp32-pentest to get started with modern (Rust ;) embedded development.

    • phkahler 30 minutes ago ago

      >> And the CPU even has SIMD instructions!

      Yes, but it looks like there is no hardware floating point. The description of the CORDIC module indicates fixed-point calculations, which is consistent with the lack of any reference to floating point.

      I am happy the have CAN-FD and Motor PWM module, but nowhere did I see conversion times listed for the ADC. For motor control I demand 1uS conversion time or less, and in the last year I've switched from fixed point to floating point after holding off on that switch for ~15 years.

      • polpo 13 minutes ago ago

        From the ESP32-S31 datasheet: "Single-precision floating-point unit (FPU) per core"

      • NooneAtAll3 22 minutes ago ago

        where did you find cordic mention?

    • Havoc 13 minutes ago ago

      Nice. Been meaning to try rust on these sort of devices but the riscv I saw thus far seemed to be mixed arm and riscv which seemed weird

    • cassepipe 37 minutes ago ago

      Curious: What does the "imac" stand for in the architecture target name ?

    • tosh 35 minutes ago ago

      very interesting, do you have a pointer with more info on what kind of SIMD support it has?

      • bobmcnamara 10 minutes ago ago

        Hopefully comparable or better than ESP32S3.

        But with the weird alignment thing fixed

  • zuzululu 6 minutes ago ago

    How do I order a few samples, seem like there is a MOQ ?

    Also I want to dive into hardware stuff but I'm always clueless as to what I do afterwards when this would arrive? Are you using a generic board or are you ordering and designing PCBs to hook this up to?

    What are you using it for ? How do I go from a prototype to mass production via kickstarter?

  • mort96 9 minutes ago ago

    This looks like the long-awaited replacement for the original ESP32. The S and C series have been relatively low performance (the S better than the C but stuck on the outgoing Xtensa architecture), the P4 is powerful but lacks wireless. This is a relatively high performance, dual core MCU with wireless; a nice default option for low volume designs where being able to copy a previous implementation is more important than saving a few cents. Just like the ESP32. Nice.

  • jml7c5 5 minutes ago ago

    Previous discussion from two months ago, when this was announced: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47561678

  • Aurornis 40 minutes ago ago

    Good to have WiFi and wired ethernet on the same part again.

    Although we lost the MIPI support that the P4 dual-core RISC-V line has.

    • tetris11 19 minutes ago ago

      How does wired internet technically work on these chips? Is it just 8 dedicated GPIO pins?

      • LeifCarrotson 2 minutes ago ago

        Not "just", it's (presumably) 8 dedicated pins that form an RMII interface. This is not the same 8 pins as you'll find in your 4-pair Ethernet cable, it's a separate protocol which can be connected to an Ethernet PHY transciever like a TI DP83867E [1], which is further connected to "magnetics" [2], a convenient package of 8 integrated transformers and chokes that provide the galvanic isolation feature of an Ethernet connection.

        A few SoCs provide integrated PHY transceivers, but usually it's an external chip.

        [1]: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/dp83867e.pdf

        [2]: https://yageogroup.com/content/datasheet/asset/file/DATASHEE...

      • BenjiWiebe a minute ago ago

        Looks like you need an external PHY. It can talk to the PHY with RGMII which uses 12 pins, which are muxed with GPIO8-19.

  • frikk 33 minutes ago ago

    I've been building hobby LED art projects with WLED (exclusively built on the ESP32 platform). It's been a blast. These little boards are so powerful and the open source community continues to amaze me.

    My preferred controller platform is of the QuinLED line - comes with power distribution, voltage regulators, fat copper lines, configurable data-line resistors, and smart auxiliary hardware support all for an affordable $30-$50 per controller. (quinled.info)

    <https://kno.wled.ge/> - WLED homepage and probably my favorite clever URL of all time.

  • hart_russell 14 minutes ago ago

    Any reason why this device wouldn't have Z-Wave? Is the wireless protocol significantly different than Thread and Zigbee?

    • mherkender 9 minutes ago ago

      I don't know for sure but Bluetooth, WiFi and Zigbee are on the same frequency band. Z-Wave is not.

      (at least in the US, not sure about other countries)

    • Aurornis 12 minutes ago ago

      This device only has a 2.4GHz radio. Z-Wave is sub-1GHz.

  • orphea 9 minutes ago ago

    It being RISC-V is awesome, but how does it make sense that it's S series when S series have been Xtensa cores? Why is it not C series?

  • skybrian 34 minutes ago ago

    I'm interested in audio out because I dabble in musical instruments.

    What's the state of Bluetooth audio out on microcontrollers? Is low latency and high quality output possible?

    • oritron 17 minutes ago ago

      Low latency in Bluetooth audio comes down to codecs and the best are proprietary.

      If you want to really cut down latency and need wireless with hardware like this, you could use a second ESP32 and send your own bitstream between them.

    • tliltocatl 17 minutes ago ago

      Is there any reason you want wireless? Bluetooth audio is a disaster, AFAIK. You don't want to use it for music. Just go wired, the ether is too cramped already.

  • nubinetwork 15 minutes ago ago

    This looks like a nucleo144, except its risc-v... but why would I use it over said nucleo144?

    • KZerda 4 minutes ago ago

      Better connectivity. The Nucleo 144 only has 100mbit ethernet, as far as I can tell, but the new ESP chip has gigabit, along with wireless.

    • bobmcnamara 10 minutes ago ago

      WiFi+BLE?

      • mort96 5 minutes ago ago

        And even if you don't need WiFi + BLE for a particular project, you may need it for other projects, and it might have value for you to standardise on one ecosystem.

  • jeremywho 41 minutes ago ago

    When can we buy these?

    • Scene_Cast2 36 minutes ago ago

      The dev boards are already up for sale. I'm personally looking forward to the modules being stocked on LCSC, no idea when though.

      • topspin 21 minutes ago ago

        > The dev boards are already up for sale.

        I didn't expect to see that for a while yet. Not the usual Espressif announce and wait a year+ pattern.

  • rie_t an hour ago ago

    Love to see more RISC-V in the wild

  • Imustaskforhelp an hour ago ago

    The 1GB bandwidth is interesting. It also has Simd instructions too.

    Could this theoretically be used as a router or wireguard vpn instance?

    • KZerda 8 minutes ago ago

      Theoretically, yeah. Though at 320Mhz, with only 2.4ghz wireless, even with two cores, I doubt it's going to get anywhere near the throughput to fill the gigabit connection.