6 comments

  • Ancalagon a day ago ago

    Is this in addition to the 30k layoffs they announced earlier this year?

  • rcbdev 17 hours ago ago

    This vendor claims that they can service their customers with 21k less employees... in the same quality?

    Our economy is a fraud.

    • pseudohadamard 10 hours ago ago

      Years ago I worked for a company in a consortium that put in a bid for a government contract. The government agency said the amount quoted was a bit high, and was there any way they could bring the cost down a bit. The consortium re-submitted essentially the same work as before but at something like a quarter of the cost of the first one. The government agency told them what they could do with their bid, and to never submit anything to them again.

  • eutropia a day ago ago

    They've got to find some way to afford those data centers, can you blame them?

    • NomDePlum 21 hours ago ago

      This is the underlying reason. Basically need to free up cashflow to pay for data centres so got rid of the people as the easiest option.

  • dnnehgf 21 hours ago ago

    that's a large number