7 comments

  • jonny_eh a minute ago ago

    So it's a JIT-in-JIT? JiJIT?

  • dag100 2 hours ago ago

    This is an incredible project for an undergraduate. Very impressive. Interesting to note that Firefox is 25% slower than Chrome/Safari, I wonder why.

  • ahartmetz 37 minutes ago ago

    Of course it beats a native interpreter. WASM overhead is about 20%, interpreter overhead is about 1000%.

    What's cool here is to have a GameBoy JIT runtime at all.

    • grashalm 8 minutes ago ago

      It's two jits in total.

  • milch 2 hours ago ago

    Very interesting article. Would've been fun to see the comparison between native interpreter & JIT-on-WASM on iOS as well

  • iberator 2 hours ago ago

    yet on real old hardware it would be 20x slower in real life. same as all native javascript junk - its fast, but non usuable on older hardware

    • switchbak an hour ago ago

      Good thing I'm not running games on my 4gb Pentium 4 then.