The metric used is per-word surprisal: -logprob of each word you type. This is just the same thing as per-word cross entropy or KL-divergence where the user distribution is one-hot. Calibrating it so text generated by frontier models scored poorly was a challenge at first. Originally ChatGPT was scoring around 54%. I'm still having trouble assigning high scores to the personalized Gemini and ChatGPT responses when I'm logged in because all my personal context gives surprising responses.
The metric used is per-word surprisal: -logprob of each word you type. This is just the same thing as per-word cross entropy or KL-divergence where the user distribution is one-hot. Calibrating it so text generated by frontier models scored poorly was a challenge at first. Originally ChatGPT was scoring around 54%. I'm still having trouble assigning high scores to the personalized Gemini and ChatGPT responses when I'm logged in because all my personal context gives surprising responses.
And yes, gibberish responses score very human :)
Funny little game, would be even funnier to have a system to roast the prose of a friend on social media or even a screenshot
Thanks! That's a great idea - i'll top up my fable budget and get started :)
holy the AI brainrot is real lmao
apparently I'm 55% clanker. probably cause english isn't my first language and I learn mostly by reading. dead internet theory?
I like this alot thanks
The calibration is set up to get some variation between humans. Dario's brainrot is even worse than yours: https://howclankerareyou.com/r/DarioAmodei