The AI Future Is for Everyone

(wsj.com)

22 points | by ms7892 10 hours ago ago

8 comments

  • andy99 10 hours ago ago

    I’m glad he feels this way and is standing up for this, even if I didn’t agree with lots of metas practice in the past (they are the same company that wouldn’t let people have access to the original llama model - though to be fair Mark might have sanctioned the leak that ultimately kicked off the modern local AI ecosystem, you can’t say Meta didn’t play a major role).

    I find it funny that this is basically a rebuttal to Dario’s thing, only because the Anthropic post was ostensibly saying “we too support open AI models” but absolutely nobody believes it to the point where someone like mark would come out and rebut the popular interpretation, ie that Anthropic wants to prevent access to open weight models.

    • SR2Z 3 hours ago ago

      They qualified their support by "safety" which strikes me as very silly considering the nature of open weight models.

  • joebuckwilliams 10 hours ago ago

    I agree with everything he wrote. I also don't believe this is actually what he believes - this is what you write when you're trying to come from behind.

  • JohnFen 10 hours ago ago

    Coming from Zuckerberg, this reads to me as equal parts sales pitch and threat.

  • undefined 10 hours ago ago
    [deleted]
  • crabbuh 10 hours ago ago

    Is this Zucks first wsj article?

  • verdverm 10 hours ago ago

    Are Mark's musings hallow or hollow while Meta Muse remains closed?

    To be clear, I really like a lot of what Zuck says in this OpEd. He needs to put his money where his mouth is for me to believe he is sincere.

  • verdverm 10 hours ago ago