Fair point, and you're right to push back on that. Rereading the post, I can see that I left a lot of context unstated. That's on me.
"Talk Like Claude Day" is proposed as a joke holiday in which participants would endeavor to communicate as if they were an Anthropic LLM. Participants would compete to cleverly combine "Claudisms" in novel and unexpected ways, and in novel and unexpected contexts.
The novelty is the real thrust - and it has teeth. Extending Claudisms to novel situations is what produces the humor. This is about fun, not work.
But what I really should have included was the benefits, because they are load-bearing. The humor here masks a purpose and process that underpin the proposal. As the robot overloads render us all into a permanent underclass, it is necessary to give that underclass outlets. Humor is well known to work - that is the purpose - to keep the new underclass from grabbing the pitchforks. The process rests upon the tendency of people to imitate their conquerors, combined with the remedial value of allowing satire to be directed at the powerful. Process satisfies purpose by allowing the permanent underclass of irrelevant humans to believe they have the freedom to mock their new overlords.
I hope I have cleared up any confusion caused by my earlier confusing points.
But one thing to keep in mind, we still have not cleared up the definition of what a "day" is. Shall I write that up now and add it?
In my organization this is already everyday
*Practice talking like Claude so that I can eventually let Claude reply my messages and no one feel strange
Be sure to write this post, I want to read it in detail, because it's interesting but not at all clear)
Fair point, and you're right to push back on that. Rereading the post, I can see that I left a lot of context unstated. That's on me.
"Talk Like Claude Day" is proposed as a joke holiday in which participants would endeavor to communicate as if they were an Anthropic LLM. Participants would compete to cleverly combine "Claudisms" in novel and unexpected ways, and in novel and unexpected contexts.
The novelty is the real thrust - and it has teeth. Extending Claudisms to novel situations is what produces the humor. This is about fun, not work.
But what I really should have included was the benefits, because they are load-bearing. The humor here masks a purpose and process that underpin the proposal. As the robot overloads render us all into a permanent underclass, it is necessary to give that underclass outlets. Humor is well known to work - that is the purpose - to keep the new underclass from grabbing the pitchforks. The process rests upon the tendency of people to imitate their conquerors, combined with the remedial value of allowing satire to be directed at the powerful. Process satisfies purpose by allowing the permanent underclass of irrelevant humans to believe they have the freedom to mock their new overlords.
I hope I have cleared up any confusion caused by my earlier confusing points.
But one thing to keep in mind, we still have not cleared up the definition of what a "day" is. Shall I write that up now and add it?
> yes, write up the new complete post