19 comments

  • oivaksef a day ago ago

    Really nice, i'd like to use this, and if the license was right probably would if it was OSS.

    I think closed source service stuff like this was long over before LLMs came along. Now it's like, I can take a few screenshots and make this myself. At least with open source YOU the developer get to carry on being in the conversation and co-develop, rather than giving ideas to others and being left out

  • drfloyd51 12 hours ago ago

    This looks like a sequence diagram than has been extended from a 2d graph to 3d with the 3rd d being “time” that you step through with a button.

    You could render this interactive diagram as a static sequence diagram quite easily. And then see all the relations in full glory at one time.

    • pandurang90 10 hours ago ago

      Yes, there is an option on top left in canvas already to visualise the diagram with 2 views - Sequence and flow.

  • _lex 2 days ago ago

    Your order flow has an issue where it's possible for someone to pay for something and not get it. You can either fix this or you might be able to use it to show the value of your product that somebody could see the bug by stepping through your diagram

    • pandurang90 2 days ago ago

      Great catch and honestly a perfect demonstration of exactly what Flostep is for.

      The payment flow on the site is a simplified demo diagram. But you're absolutely right that stepping through a diagram like this is one of the best ways to catch edge cases before they become bugs, that's one of the core use cases we see.

      Would love to know: is this something you'd use in PR reviews to catch issues like this early?

      • setr a day ago ago

        It’s hard to imagine someone creating these for PRs? Unless it was auto-generated, but even then it’d only be relevant for fairly large/novel PRs — and then it’s functionally the same as documentation use case.

        You’d also probably need some mechanism to visually diff the flowcharts to participate in discussions/changes

  • mohanz a day ago ago

    It's pretty neat. Is there any way for me to share a doc to my agent and let it help me with creating diagrams?

  • btreecat a day ago ago

    Online only diagrams is a hard no for me. I'd rather commit the mermaid and render a png and share that then have another issue with seats/license for critical documentation.

    • pandurang90 16 hours ago ago

      I understand concern behind online only. But, there is also an option to download it as static image. Does it solve the issue for you?

      • btreecat 3 hours ago ago

        With the increased instability of global infrastructure, being able to edit locally is critical IMO.

        Others may feel different.

  • qwertytyyuu 2 days ago ago

    This looks pretty! Looks to be really good for presentations

    • pandurang90 2 days ago ago

      Thank you! Presentations are actually one of the strongest use cases, being able to walk an interviewer or stakeholder through a system one interaction at a time, rather than pointing at a static blob of boxes and arrows.

      Would love to know what you'd use it for specifically — system design interviews, team demos, something else?

  • dinglidingli 16 hours ago ago

    This is really beautiful, but like others said, being online only is a bit disappointing (though understandable). Are there any plans for extensibility in the future?

    • pandurang90 16 hours ago ago

      I understand concern behind online only. But, there is also an option to download it as static image. Does it solve the issue for you?

      On extensibility, genuinely open to hearing what you'd want. What would "extensible" look like for your workflow specifically?

      • dinglidingli 11 hours ago ago

        Static images are fine, but you lose the benefit of interaction particularly when presenting. Wifi isn't always available so it's nice when the user can have a fallback compiled HTML to use.

        As for extensibility - I understand that your focus is system design, but I don't really see any reason for this to not be more broadly available for any sort of process design, particularly for use as a UX tool or in the product ownership space for understanding how systems and physical processes might be interconnected. I see that you can add any custom node in the code, and they just get a little gear icon, but it would be nice if the user could define the nodes themselves, add meta data, conditionals, loops etc. I've been using BPMN for years but I'd be lying if I said it wasn't outdated and a pain to present to people.

        • pandurang90 5 hours ago ago

          Yes, we are working on some updates on that section. Thanks for highlighting it. Also you can change the icon by clicking on it. There are different icons available.

  • pandurang90 2 days ago ago

    [flagged]