15 comments

  • hungryhobbit 6 hours ago ago

    These things are not safe, and they are deliberately using them on people who can't sue and defend themselves.

    This will not end well if you have any respect for basic human rights (even for non-US citizens).

    • gnuplustoejam 6 hours ago ago

      Is it specifically the camera or the single robotic arm meant for manipulating hazardous objects — which resembles a grocery store claw game — that you likely believe is biting into illegal immigrants' legs like a robotic German shepherd?

      You have not done the bare minimum of research before blasting out your hilariously melodramatic comment.

      • JumpCrisscross 6 hours ago ago

        I think it’s more that an agency that defends murderers in their ranks isn’t going to have a problem deploying something that injures innocent Americans as it tries to do whatever it’s meant to.

        On the upside, I look forward to everyone at Boston Dynamics being subpoenaed for the next few years. Maybe we’ll get some new entrants from the departures.

        • gnuplustoejam 5 hours ago ago

          > deploying something that injures innocent Americans

          Except that's not what's happening here. In fact, quite the opposite, it's more like robotic PPE.

          • JumpCrisscross 4 hours ago ago

            > that's not what's happening here

            Nobody claimed anyone has been injured by these devices yet. (They haven’t been deployed in public.)

            The reasonable concern is that when they are deployed, they are likely to injure someone because the people deploying them have been eagerly hurting—and defending those who hurt—innocent Americans.

        • Dig1t 3 hours ago ago

          These robots are 2 feet tall and don’t come equipped with weapons.

          Genuinely curious how you are saying they are dangerous? Are they more or less dangerous than a human with a gun?

          • JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago ago

            > These robots are 2 feet tall and don’t come equipped with weapons

            They were barely deployed to regular police when fastening flash-bang grenades to them came up [1].

            > Are they more or less dangerous than a human with a gun?

            I genuinely don’t see these being used as an “or.” It’s undertrained idiots with guns plus these, or just the former.

            [1] https://www.semafor.com/article/05/19/2026/worker-backlash-o...

      • snypher 3 hours ago ago

        They could just drive it into someone.

        >hazardous gas detection, search and rescue, as well as suspicious package investigations

        What the fuck does that have to do with immigration and customs enforcement?

    • e40 2 hours ago ago

      It also feels like an alpha test, without risk were it to be conducted on citizens.

      • platinumrad 43 minutes ago ago

        ICE manages to harass and detain plenty of citizens.

    • ncr100 4 hours ago ago

      Evocative of the Robocop movie.

    • Dig1t 3 hours ago ago

      In what way are they not safe?

      Unless you strap a gun to one (which they are not doing afaik) how could they actually cause harm to a human?

    • cyanydeez 4 hours ago ago

      They dont.

  • 1attice 3 hours ago ago

    I see several comments on this chat referencing "innocent Americans".

    Might I suggest "innocent people?"

    Thanks.

    - a former US immigrant, who left when things got spicy

  • gnuplustoejam 6 hours ago ago

    > will be used in operations deemed unsafe for human agents, like hazardous gas detection, search and rescue, as well as suspicious package investigations

    Cyberpunk, albeit a nothing-burger.

    These are not the metal-toothed cartoon dogs you so badly want them to be.