12 comments

  • BjoernKW 16 minutes ago ago

    Quite a few years ago, Erik Dietrich proposed "efficiencer": https://daedtech.com/starting-tech-firm-efficiencer/

    I've always liked that term and it's more fitting than ever.

  • bsenftner 26 minutes ago ago

    I've been using "Mad Computer Scientist" for 26 years now as my official title.

  • austin-cheney 3 hours ago ago

    Engineer was almost never appropriate before. Very few people writing software ever measured anything or innovated anything new. Now, if you are not writing code I cannot imagine how developer would be appropriate.

    For people who just feed agents I would use the title: trainer.

  • kayashaolu2 10 hours ago ago

    This is what I think: we will go through all of these other titles and then come back to software engineer (e.g. remember Prompt Engineer?).

    The reason IMO is that true software engineering hasn’t been about producing code. It’s about solving problems by building maintainable systems. The best software engineers don’t only build for the feature, they build for the extensibility, maintainability, and scalability of the feature. That is the art of engineering software that I think we can still take pride in even during this AI era.

  • robobo96 2 hours ago ago

    I think the value is shifting: it's moving from actually building the thing to deciding what to build: Product Engineer?

  • farseer an hour ago ago

    Enabler

  • drstewart 5 hours ago ago

    Agent Babysitter

  • ZYZ64738 8 hours ago ago

    Developtisaurus

  • nacozarina 10 hours ago ago

    Software Whisperers

  • drsalt 8 hours ago ago

    code jockey / code monkey

  • toomuchtodo 10 hours ago ago

    Solutions engineer. You’re solving problems with a non deterministic natural language compiler, context in, code out.

  • axegon_ 5 hours ago ago

    In 95% of all cases - slopper/clanker.