18 comments

  • colijobles 5 hours ago ago

    Brilliant application. Imagine the progress we could make with models post trained on scientific process and a good agentic process.

    I've been tinkering with the latter for the last couple of months. Yesterday my system made some progress on instabilities on a particular superconductive system: https://colinocallaghan.com/autonomous-ai-research/Spatial-P...

  • __alias 4 hours ago ago

    Laughed at the reddit comment

    > "We got vibe astronomy before GTA6"

  • ContinuityLab 6 hours ago ago

    Cool discovery, but I'd be real curious about the false-positive rate when letting coding agents loose on raw astronomical telemetry. Hallucinations in data reduction are no joke.

    • pizza234 6 hours ago ago

      From the discussion:

      > even got NASA to point a telescope at it for confirmation

    • colijobles 5 hours ago ago

      with a proper stats harness the false positive rate can be brought well down to acceptable levels

    • phoronixrly 6 hours ago ago

      Oh don't worry, after claude democratises astronomy the false positives will be cleaned up by the real astronomers. As seen in math and open-source development.

      This will be the first time I've had anything in common with a mathematician btw -- wading through heaps of claudeism-infested slop all day long.

  • VCFundedGenYer an hour ago ago

    Vibe researching is not real researching. Leave it to the experts at NASA.

    • black6 27 minutes ago ago

      We're coming back around to an era of the Citizen Scientist.

  • higeorge13 7 hours ago ago

    This is incredible use of AI tools. Big kudos!

  • k310 6 hours ago ago

    Planet Claude?

    Asking for a friend.

  • amirkhanian 4 hours ago ago

    [flagged]

  • wartywhoa23 6 hours ago ago

    Found a planet and saved a granny. Wake me up when this planet is acknowledged by any astonomer community with more say than r/ClaudeAI.

    • thiht 3 hours ago ago

      Like NASA?

  • soltanov 6 hours ago ago

    Call me when peer review confirms it; until then, it is noise fitting noise. (Reason: Clean cut through the hype directly to scientific validation.)

    • soltanov an hour ago ago

      I don't understand the downvotes on this topic. Almost everybody is in grey :)

  • _fuchs 6 hours ago ago

    So much AI in the writing. If you dont care to write i do not care to read.