9 comments

  • free_bip 9 hours ago ago

    I expected this to be a title typo ($2m instead of $2) but no, that's the correct number. I'm not informed on this case so I have to wonder why, the article doesn't say.

    • toast0 8 hours ago ago

      Juries can be kind of random. If it's hard to figure out what the dollar amount of damages should be, they might pick a small or big number to be done.

    • mrandish 5 hours ago ago

      The jury must've felt that Qualcomm prevailed on the legal merits but thought Qualcomm's damage claims were bullshit. Juries tend to be pretty emotional. When they feel one party clearly wronged the other, they can award extravagant damages, which is why jury damages are often later reduced by judges for being unjustified.

      Conversely, when they award $2.00 of damages, to me they're telling Qualcomm "You're technically right but shouldn't have wasted everyone's time bringing this stupid lawsuit."

  • tssva 4 hours ago ago

    The jury awarded $2 but the jury's ruling means that the judge in the case can now in a future ruling ban Arm from collecting licensing fees from Qualcomm for 5 years. This would be billions of dollars lost for Arm.

  • throwa356262 8 hours ago ago

    I hope Arm appeals :)

  • johannesrexx 2 hours ago ago

    If you go to Qualcomm's page about it winning this verdict you realize the company is flat out misrepresenting that this is a nothing burger, that in fact ARM won the other four charges.

    https://investor.qualcomm.com/news-events/press-releases/new...

  • BobbyTables2 6 hours ago ago

    Does McDonalds still have the dollar menu?

    • RiverCrochet 6 hours ago ago

      only if you want water, a coffee at certain times of the day, or a sauce with no other food.

  • Der_Einzige 8 hours ago ago

    Please god I hope it was paid with a 2 dollar bill.