Curious, did you come up with the name "Muse" and make the character art ? Or did you and Zuck coincidentally use similar LLM prompts. If Meta's version was AI gen'd they wouldn't be able to copyright it suggesting it's likely human designed. But if that human design is a derivative of your art, which it seems to be, then they wouldn't have copyright either.
Anyone that needs to be told not to trust Zuck at this point is probably beyond saving.
I made this site months ago, mocking the idea of a personal AI assistant who controls your life:
Https://lifeos.nexus
Meta literally brought my dystopian vision to life - it’s exactly the same concept, and the AI assistants LOOK the same and one is even named Muse.
Fun site and your Muse is a near match to Meta's.
Curious, did you come up with the name "Muse" and make the character art ? Or did you and Zuck coincidentally use similar LLM prompts. If Meta's version was AI gen'd they wouldn't be able to copyright it suggesting it's likely human designed. But if that human design is a derivative of your art, which it seems to be, then they wouldn't have copyright either.
Here is another data point.
Muse is literally a beige Labubu with ears cut off and face swapped with a smiley. Labubu is a valuable trademark of Pop Mart.
sue them for IP infringement dude. you're sitting on a gold mine with your art, seriously, and you could put a stop to it.
Reminder: You don’t need any of this.
Too late, AI bros stay winning!
[dead]