5 comments

  • mdp2021 6 hours ago ago

    Again a very shallow piece.

    Which again raises the question: where are we going to get depth if humans so grossly evidently increasingly renounce it.

    What have we studied AI for? To perfect intellectual endeavour. And in times of combined scarcity, the need for synthetic intelligence should be evident. I am shocked that the point is regularly missed in debate.

    • bitwize 5 hours ago ago

      "You want to protect the world, but you don't want it to change. How is humanity going to be saved if it's not allowed to evolve?"

      • mdp2021 5 hours ago ago

        You have placed what can be intended to be quote marks around the text: please specify the source at least if relevant to understanding what you may mean - but please do rewrite the contents of your post into an argument. It seems you are implying that something would "curb the evolution of humanity".

        If there is one thing that, on the contrary, is instead a fundamental nutrient for the evolution of Humanity, is the presence of Intelligence (being exposed to expressions of Intelligence). We have to strive towards that.

        And, meanwhile, uncontained empowered deficiency (from unfinished humans especially) - veeery agent in these times and age - should be more feared than direct weapons.

        • jacquesm 3 hours ago ago

          The day the Earth stood still.

        • aaron695 4 hours ago ago

          [dead]