> post title: Federal judge rules Flock violated the fourth amendment
Please fix this wrong title. The judge ruled that searching the data without a warrant or probable cause violated the fourth amendment. It's wrong to say that the problem was the cameras and not the warrantless use of the data.
Literally in the tweet: "police violated the Fourth Amendment by searching [ALPR data] without a warrant"
This title is 100% false. It is not possible for a private company to "violate the 4th amendment". The Bill of Rights constrains the government, not private parties.
> post title: Federal judge rules Flock violated the fourth amendment
Please fix this wrong title. The judge ruled that searching the data without a warrant or probable cause violated the fourth amendment. It's wrong to say that the problem was the cameras and not the warrantless use of the data.
Literally in the tweet: "police violated the Fourth Amendment by searching [ALPR data] without a warrant"
[dead]
This title is 100% false. It is not possible for a private company to "violate the 4th amendment". The Bill of Rights constrains the government, not private parties.