Tencent Hy4

(hy.tencent.ai)

48 points | by Philpax 4 hours ago ago

6 comments

  • ByteAtATime 14 minutes ago ago

    The price numbers look weirdly specific, I wonder where they came from.

    Personally, the thing I'm most excited about is the FrontierCode 2.0 score, which is a benchmark I trust a bit more - 31 seems to be roughly on par with 6.1 Sol and Opus 5.5 medium

  • minimaxir 32 minutes ago ago

    Slightly worse than Kimi 3.1M Pro (which just released open weights today) but much cheaper even excluding the current 50% off promotion, and Tencent promises to make it even cheaper once it goes open-weight. Interesting price economics.

  • erulabs 13 minutes ago ago

    increasingly feeling like the entire US economy hangs on whether or not Ant/OAI can stay ahead of the Chinese models.

    If the gap closes, we do zero austerity, and interest rates are high, I cannot see a way out of a major economic crisis, even if we do start to see dramatic productivity wins.

    More on-topic (and maybe more positive?), but this model feels a bit more expensive than I would have expected!

  • esafak 15 minutes ago ago

    Not cost competitive. The performance difference is not commensurate with the price.

       Model          | Cached Input | Input (Miss) | Output
       ---------------|--------------|--------------|----------
       Tencent Hy4    | $0.042       | $0.83        | $2.50
       DeepSeek (peak)| $0.006       | $0.30        | $1.20
       DeepSeek (off) | $0.003       | $0.15        | $0.60
    • ActionHank 10 minutes ago ago

      Wild that this is the first question I ask at this point. After that it’s a question of how it stacks intelligence wise vs glm or ds.

      OAI / Ant are in for a reckoning.

  • Computer0 13 minutes ago ago

    How does it do with tasks anthropic doesn’t like? This is my main use case for open models.