10 comments

  • swiftcoder 4 hours ago ago

    This is very cool, I wish they would make quality+time comparisons between the various quantisations though

    • amelius 2 hours ago ago

      Yeah this is only meaningful if you can compare quality at least.

      Otherwise, it's just like saying: we compressed a JPEG file to 50% of its size using some compression level and we didn't check what it looks like.

    • Reubend 3 hours ago ago

      Seconded, I'd like to see a head to head comparison to see how the quant loks vs the original

  • ricardobeat 3 hours ago ago

    Their product page has sample videos: https://www.videorebirth.com/lp/hyperflow-flash

  • kodablah 2 hours ago ago

    Am curious how this compares perf/quality wise with FastVideo's FastH3 trim/omni which I have been using pretty well with a basic laptop NVidia card (e.g. 5s 480p video w/ audio in 90s).

  • xrd 4 hours ago ago

    I see references to comfyui in the readme. Is that the easiest way to run it? I've always found it a bit cumbersome to use and wish I had something like a simple CLI tool to use it like llama.cpp. Perhaps that's not possible with a video diffusion model?

    • syntaxing 3 hours ago ago

      I use stable diffusion cpp with a LLM driving it using CLI. It’s been the quickest way for me to run new diffusion models and require near zero skills but the results come out great.

      • _boffin_ 3 hours ago ago

        care to go more into your loop that you've setup

        • syntaxing an hour ago ago

          Not much too it! Use Hermes, *Claw, Claude cowork, etc and go like "setup this model <huggingface link> using stablediffusion cpp on this computer." Then when its done, in the same session "Use this as the main image (or video) generator moving forward" and it'll change the config

    • swiftcoder 4 hours ago ago

      They also have references to stable-diffusion.cpp, which is probably the closest analogue to llama.cpp in this space