8 comments

  • braiamp 9 hours ago ago

    These skills seem to heavily prefer JS when plain HTML would do, in some cases just because it "looks less clobbered". Like really, if you are on a js front end heavy shop, this probably matches your mental model. If you prefer rendering on server and only use js for actually interactable elements, look elsewhere

    • chneu 9 hours ago ago

      JavaScript sucks and shouldn't be used in web design.

      • sharts 3 hours ago ago

        fax

      • ericyd 9 hours ago ago

        Damn. Totally shattered my worldview. Prophetic.

    • sublinear 3 hours ago ago

      > If you prefer rendering on server and only use js for actually interactable elements, look elsewhere

      Server-side rendered HTML is not plain HTML. Static HTML is always an option (the right one).

      Failing that, I would strongly prefer a JS-heavy SPA instead of anything rendered on a server. It's unquestionably the lesser evil.

      I would have been just as right about this a decade ago, but an SSR project in 2026 gives off a strong smell. I would have to assume the devs are naive about the realities and pitfalls of web dev. What happens if we need to change hosting or can't have the baggage of a server runtime, are those dependencies durably documented anyway, can we deploy without involving other teams, etc.?

  • ChrisArchitect 7 hours ago ago

    [dupe] Discussion on the Show HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50443812

  • cadamsdotcom 9 hours ago ago
  • carplaybits 7 hours ago ago

    [flagged]